The New York Times Social Media Policy

I chose to critique The New York Times, social media policy. I like how the first point of their policy is to stating, that no one shall upload, or distribute, absence, pornographic, abusive or illegal material. I think this allows their site to stay notable and reliable. Social media brings a lot of people outside comments, and which could lead into disrespectful language. Another point the New York times mentions is, “ Use of respectful language, Like any community, the online conversation flourishes only when our Members feel welcome and safe. You agree not to use language that abuses or discriminates on the basis of race, religion, nationality, gender, sexual preference, age, region, disability, etc. Hate speech of any kind is grounds for immediate and permanent suspension of access to all or part of the Services.” Along with “Debate, do not attack.” Though NYT encourages active discussions and welcomes heated debate on the Services, commentaries are found disrespecting others or creating personal attacks, “is a these Terms of Service and are grounds for immediate and permanent suspension of access to all or part of the Service.” I also like the 3.5 policy part as well, this states that you are responsible for your submission though The New York Times has the right to delete, move or edit any submission that is sent that includes, abusive, defamatory, obscene, and violation of copy right and trade marks. I know debating can get pretty heated especially when a topic is being talked about that is very important to you. And when others are attacking what you think is right this can lead to over stepping your words, and using hurtful words towards others in the debate/ discussion. I believe the New York Times social media policy, is ver fair and very well written, it states what they encourage, what they do not encourage, and the potential outcomes of being disrespectful on their site.

 http://www.nytimes.com/content/help/rights/terms/terms-of-service.html#discussions